Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 742 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 78 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 800 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |