Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 36 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 410 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |