Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 130 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 410 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |