Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 14 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 46 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 410 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |