Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 13 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Cherokee is 20 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |