Jeep Cherokee 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 14 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Cherokee is 27 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 820 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1950 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |