Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 4 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.1 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 10 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 384 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 999 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`359 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |