Jeep Cherokee 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 18 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.4 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Cherokee 2001 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 909 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1951 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 499 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 110 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`359 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |