Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 319 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 51 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 106 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.6 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 675 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.62 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`360 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |