Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 158 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 46 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.6 | |
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`688 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |