Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 249 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 27 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 151 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.0 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Grand Vitara engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`688 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |