Jeep Cherokee 2005 vs BMW X3 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 46 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.1 | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Cherokee is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`688 | 2`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
BMW X3 has
| |