Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.7 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 205 HP | 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 8 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Jeep Commander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 78 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 30 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 708 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`540 | 2`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
| |