Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 17 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 123 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |