Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 13 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 405 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 473 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |