Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 41 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 26 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 100 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |