Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 27 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 524 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 354 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |