Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Renault Koleos 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 27 HP more power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Renault Koleos. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2011 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Koleos, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 428 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The Renault Koleos may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |