Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Sportage is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 7 HP less power than Kia Sportage, but torque is 78 NM more than Kia Sportage. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 564 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 314 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.58 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.22 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |