Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Jeep Compass 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 460 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 41 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Jeep Compass gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.45 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 328 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1269 litres | |
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 550 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 6600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |