Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Commander is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 41 HP less power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Jeep Commander. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 30 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1940 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 666 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jeep Commander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |