Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 12 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, but torque is 212 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 14.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Santa FE engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia Magentis, Hyundai Grandeur | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Cherokee is 19 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 969 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1582 litres | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 91 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |