Jeep Cherokee 2008 vs BMW X1 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 34 HP more power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 140 NM more than BMW X1. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 585 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm longer than the BMW X1, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 878 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Cherokee has 458 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`520 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
BMW X1 has
| |