Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 271 HP | 304 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 33 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 83 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`440 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 13 600 | 16 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |