Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 271 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 125 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 128 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |