Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 271 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 121 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 117 NM more than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |