Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 271 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee 2013 engine produces 66 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee 2008, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Jeep Cherokee 2008. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 11.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 15.2 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee 2013 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee 2008, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee 2013 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee 2008. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee 2013 is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 13 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee 2008, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 878 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee 2008 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee 2013 has 466 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee 2008. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee 2008, which means Jeep Cherokee 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |