Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 271 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 121 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.9 | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda Accord | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 589 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 177 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 13 400 | 14 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |