Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 271 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 121 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 125 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 177 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |