Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 271 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 26 HP more power than Audi Q5, but torque is 35 NM less than Audi Q5. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Cherokee and Audi Q5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 48 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`435 | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |