Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 63 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.5 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 83 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`385 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |