Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee 2013 and Jeep Cherokee 2008 have the same engine power, but Jeep Cherokee 2013 torque is 231 NM less than Jeep Cherokee 2008. Jeep Cherokee 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.4 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee 2013 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee 2008, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee 2013 is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 13 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee 2008, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 878 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee 2008 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee 2013 has 466 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee 2008. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee 2013 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee 2008, which means Jeep Cherokee 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`385 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |