Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 13 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 9 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.4 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`385 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |