Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 13 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 9 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.4 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 177 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`385 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |