Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 3 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 51 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 8.6 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Cherokee is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 58 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`291 | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |