Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 7 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.0 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2013: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Renegade, Chrysler 200 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jeep Patriot, Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Compass might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 16 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 46 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`291 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |