Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 20 HP more power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 177 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`475 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |