Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 138 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`475 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |