Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 7 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger. Jeep Cherokee is 16 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 46 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`475 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |