Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs BMW X3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 80 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 210 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.0 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 550 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 138 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`475 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee scores higher in safety tests, but BMW X3 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
BMW X3 has
| |