Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Jeep Cherokee engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 83 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |