Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 7 HP less power than Subaru Forester, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
| Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Outback, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 93 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Forester. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |