Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Subaru Forester 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Subaru Forester) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 10 HP less power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 152 NM more than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 8.2 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Used also on Subaru XV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres more than that of the Subaru Forester, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |