Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.8 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`450 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |