Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda CR-V, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2015: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly communicates with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and the electric power steering to maintain full control of the vehicle, good traction and maneuverability in any road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.10 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 24 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 177 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |