Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Opel Antara 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Antara is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 23 HP less power than Opel Antara, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.3 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Used also on Chevrolet Captiva | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Antara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but lower. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Opel Antara, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 419 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 7 litres less trunk space than the Opel Antara. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Opel Antara has
| |