Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 37 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 277 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |