Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 37 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Cherokee has 277 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |