Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 29 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 117 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | no data | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 191 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |