Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 30 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.4 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Jeep Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Jeep Cherokee is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 67 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |