Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs BMW X3 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X3 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 44 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X3. Due to the lower power, Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.6 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Renegade | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X3 2010 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW X3 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
BMW X3 has more luggage space. Jeep Cherokee has 138 litres less trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`450 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee scores higher in safety tests, but BMW X3 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
BMW X3 has
| |