Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 124 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Jeep Cherokee engine produces 16 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Cherokee could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Cherokee consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Toyota RAV4 2012: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantaneously between the front and rear wheels to improve cornering performance, with up to 50 percent of engine power going to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated at speeds below 40 km/h and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Cherokee is 5 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 577 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 165 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`291 | 2`190 | |
Safety: | |||
The Jeep Cherokee scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 13 400 | 12 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |