Jeep Cherokee 2013 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Cherokee engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Thanks to more power Jeep Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.3 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Cherokee is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 412 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Cherokee has 58 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This could mean that the Jeep Cherokee uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Cherokee is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Jeep Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`291 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Cherokee has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |